Bibliography

Investigating NEPAD’s (New Partnership for Africa’s Development) Development Assumptions

The New Partnership for Africa’s Development (NEPAD) proposes a new strategy to bring about the development of the African continent. In order to assess NEPAD, it is necessary to reveal what NEPAD takes development to be. This article suggests that development, however it is understood, includes three aspects: a characterization of the current situation which shows this situation to be undesirable, the envisaging of a desirable future, and the positing of a strategy that should be followed in order to bring about the desirable future. The article assesses NEPAD by examining the assumptions it makes with regard to these three aspects of development; and through such an examination reveals NEPAD to be an ambiguous and unimaginative project. While Africans thus have reason to feel discouraged by the emergence of NEPAD, the critical responses to NEPAD made by African academics and civil society groups are encouraging. These responses give rise to the hope that the African continent may yet see the emergence of alternative visions of a better future, and alternative paths to realize such visions. Bibliogr., notes, ref., sum. [Journal abstract]

Title: Investigating NEPAD’s (New Partnership for Africa’s Development) Development Assumptions
Author: Matthews, Sally
Year: 2004
Periodical: Review of African Political Economy
Volume: 31
Issue: 101
Period: September
Pages: 497-511
Language: English
Geographic term: Africa
External links: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/0305624042000295567
http://ejournals.ebsco.com/direct.asp?ArticleID=XX7LA0U702UHYCUGFJQB
Abstract: The New Partnership for Africa’s Development (NEPAD) proposes a new strategy to bring about the development of the African continent. In order to assess NEPAD, it is necessary to reveal what NEPAD takes development to be. This article suggests that development, however it is understood, includes three aspects: a characterization of the current situation which shows this situation to be undesirable, the envisaging of a desirable future, and the positing of a strategy that should be followed in order to bring about the desirable future. The article assesses NEPAD by examining the assumptions it makes with regard to these three aspects of development; and through such an examination reveals NEPAD to be an ambiguous and unimaginative project. While Africans thus have reason to feel discouraged by the emergence of NEPAD, the critical responses to NEPAD made by African academics and civil society groups are encouraging. These responses give rise to the hope that the African continent may yet see the emergence of alternative visions of a better future, and alternative paths to realize such visions. Bibliogr., notes, ref., sum. [Journal abstract]