|Title:||Winners, losers and the playing field in Southern Africa’s ‘democratic darlings’: Botswana and South Africa compared|
De Jager, Nicola
Meintjes, Cara H.
|Periodical:||Politikon: South African Journal of Political Studies (ISSN 0258-9346)|
|Abstract:||Botswana and South Africa are often hailed as Southern Africa’s democratic darlings. These democracies, however, occur within the context of dominant party systems; one party dominates over a prolonged period in an ostensibly democratic system. The Botswana Democratic Party has ruled since 1965, while the African National Congress has governed since 1994. This paper aims to ascertain what happens to opposition parties within dominant party systems, using Levitsky and Way (2010) theory of an ‘uneven playing field’, where democratic competition is undermined less by electoral fraud or repression than by unequal access to State institutions, resources and the media. The leaders of key opposition parties in both countries have been interviewed. It is subsequently argued that opposition parties are weakened by the dominant party system context, and so declaring their elections as ‘fair’ becomes problematic. Despite this, some of the opposition parties have adopted a number of strategies to remain relevant: cooperation, coalition and co-optation. Bibliogr., notes, ref., sum. [Journal abstract]|
If you like this academic paper, see others like it:
- Structural change in developing countries: Patterns, causes and consequences
- Ending youth unemployment in sub-saharan Africa: Does ICT development have any role?
- Exchange rate volatility and pass-through to inflation in South Africa
- Impartial versus Selective Justice: How Power Shapes Transitional Justice in Africa
- Gographies de l’insoumission et variations rgionales du discours nationaliste au Cameroun (1948-1955)
- Along the museological grain: An exploration of the (geo)political inheritance in ‘Isishweshwe Story – Material Women?’