ECOWAS: The Ideals and Practice of Regional Economic Integration
1.1 Background to the Study
One of the most discussed themes over the past two decades in scholarly studies, political discourse, and international media is regional integration. The extent of the emergence of regional integration remains closely linked to the rise of globalization and the need for countries to negotiate agreements to facilitating all forms of exchanges and transactions. Regional integration has been an evolving process for many decades now and different regions have embraced it. Its evolution was very much in the form of integrating actors’ concerns with economic and security issues to the inclusion of other concerns such as social, cultural, environmental, and other developmental needs. It is, however, the commitment and the achievement of set goals by the member states in the various regional integrating bodies that have determined how far they have gone with the process, and have distinguished very successful regional integration organizations from others.
It is worthy to note that the promises of regional integration since the publication of Viner (1950) and Balassa (1967) have had positive feedback from some groups of countries (Northern America Free Trade Agreement – NAFTA; MERCOSUR; Association of Southeast Asian Nations – ASEAN) and negative for others mostly African economies (Common Market for Eastern and Southern Africa – COMESA; Economic Community of West African States – ECOWAS; Economic Community of Central African States – ECCAS) (Tinta, 2017). However, regional integration remains crucial for Africa to increase its competitiveness and diversify its economy, especially for fragile economies such as ECOWAS.
The inauguration of the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) in Lagos, Nigeria on 28 May 1975 was greeted as a critical breakthrough in efforts to institute a framework for economic cooperation and integration that embraced the entire sub-region. Forty-three (43) years down the line, two treaties in, and several reforms to the institutional structure of the organization, question marks still hang over the relevance of the institution to the teeming population of the West African Sub-region. Most observers have raised doubts over the success of ECOWAS as an economic organization due to the slow pace of integration, which is the primary goal of the organization (Kufour, 2006).
Numerous problems plagued the first regime of the organization. Some of these problems include inadequacy of the legal framework, failure to meet objectives of the community such as the Trade Liberalization Scheme (TLS), non-ratification of community protocols, and a general sense of distrust towards the intentions of the regional hegemony, Nigeria. In essence, ECOWAS under the first regime was nothing short of an agora, or a platform for discussion, ‘where things cannot just get done. The emergence of violent conflicts in the early 90s changed the trajectory of the community’s objectives culminating in the revision of its treaty and giving it a human rights overlay. The intervention of ECOWAS in the troubled Member States notably Liberia and Sierra Leone triggered legal and political debates not just on the role of the ECOWAS in peace and security but also culminated in greater emphasis on protecting universal values such as human rights, democracy, and the rule of law (Klabbers, 2005).
Indeed regional integration is regarded as beneficial in numerous senses and serves substantial economic aims in addition to presenting a stabilizing factor in inter-state relations. Scholars of all disciplines, however, stress the fact that regionalism as such, is emerging as a phenomenon in its own right and may not be situated without extreme care into diverse geographical and socio-economic contexts. In this light, regional economic integration may also have worrying implications. Where it does not play out by liberal assumptions of perfect markets and perfect competition, it may even be sub-optimal in systemic and political terms, in part because grave situational and structural constraints may pose threats to the functionality of given configurations with alarming implications for overall stability, efficiency, coherence and trade costs.
Economic integration remains one of the key objectives of the Community and the general continent. The benefits of economic integration are not in dispute. The urgency with which it should be pursued is expressed in the following words of the United Nations Economic Commission for Africa (UNECA):
This shift (the global movement to integrate economies) is nowhere more urgent than in Africa, where the combined impact of relatively small economies, international terms of trade, and the legacy of colonialism, misrule, and conflict has meant that we have not yet assumed our global market share-despite our significant market size (UNCTAD, 2009: ix).
However, the limited progress in economic integration and the pre-occupation of the organization with human rights protection, peace, and security has drawn the attention of scholars to the initial ideals upon which ECOWAS was established. The emergent norms in the practice of the organization since its intervention in the troubled Member States have also raised important questions about the limits of an organization originally dedicated to economic integration, but whose mandate has extended to peace and security, and human rights spheres. The ideals and practices of ECOWAS as an international organization within the West Africa region are where the inquest of this study lies. It is argued that the capacity of community institutions to deliver the vast mandate in human rights protection, peace and security, and the rule of law in line with a paradigm shift in regional integration in the continent is fundamental to the long-term success of the organization.
1.2 Statement of the Problem
ECOWAS, like most international organizations, is faced with the challenge of establishing its legitimacy, especially when it concerns delivering on its mandate of regional integration. At first, the legitimacy of ECOWAS was hardly contested, perhaps due to Cold War and the limitations it imposed on the organization’s role. It was viewed by both its members and other states as focused on and established primarily for economic integration. However, the emergence of violent domestic conflicts which has had lasting repercussions on the role of ECOWAS in member states has expanded the understanding of peace and security and human rights in the organization. More importantly, the legitimacy question was brought to the fore primarily due to the military interventions in Liberia and Sierra Leone.
Going by the tenets upon which ECOWAS was established, it was supposed to ensure that the countries in the region as member states get substantial benefits in trade and development. It has been observed that uniting African economies will permit exploitation of economies of scale, ensure competitive markets, provide access to wider trading and investment environments promote exports to regional markets, provide the requisite experience to compete in the multilateral trade system, and provide a framework for them to co-operate in developing common services for finance, transportation, and communication.
Throughout the past century much has changed in the governance of the global economy. Stemming from the increasingly complex dynamics of economic integration, scholarly interest therein has increased almost exponentially. In addition to improving growth rates in many parts of the world, these developments have, however, also given rise to substantial challenges. As economic and financial markets mature and the ramifications of globalization become ever more apparent, underlying economic deficiencies take their toll on actors’ competitiveness in the global system, regardless of their economic and political standing. In Africa, the problems stemming from this evolution are even more pronounced. Political instability, poverty, and civil unrest exacerbated by lacking infrastructure, poorly developed human resources and a weak private sector depict African economic realities.
Though regional economic integration initially emerged to ease West African integration into the world economy, the stagnation of intraregional trade brought about increased interest in the (in-) efficiency of ECOWAS as an economic integration scheme, having been treated with benign neglect for the best part of the past four decades. In the Sub-Saharan region, the outcome of integration has been far from promising. Africa’s internal trade has remained minimal, with more than 80 percent of exports destined for external markets, not least due to external ‘post-colonial’ ties. Not only may regionalism, therefore, advance from faulty theoretical premises, but the lack of political will and internal legitimacy as endogenous determinants of failure are also particularly excruciating. Challenges are rooted in chronic structural and institutional weaknesses, whereby regional economic integration suffers from duplication as well as lacking political bases, deeply entrenched in the incompatibility of the divide between regional economic integration and critical national priorities.
The problem of this study is whether the present state of regional economic integration as implemented by ECOWAS is effective in its prevalent structural form, with a specific focus on trade, regional industrial development, food security as well as road and railway infrastructures.
1.3 Objectives of the Study
To examine how the implementation of ECOWAS treaties and policies impacts the free movement of goods and trade; regional industrial development; food security as well as road and railway infrastructures among member states in the region.
i. To access the impact of Free Trade Areas and Common External Tariffs on the free movement of goods and services within the ECOWAS region.
ii. To examine the contribution of the West African Common Industrial Policy (WACIP) on regional industrial development in the region.
iii. To examine the impact of the ECOWAS Regional Agricultural Investment Programme (RAIP) on the level of food security in the region.
iv. To establish how the implementation of the ECOWAS Programme for Infrastructure Development in Africa (PIDA) has contributed to the development of road and railway infrastructures in the region.
v. To suggest measures that should be employed by ECOWAS to deliver on its mandate of regional economic integration for member states.
1.4 Research Questions
The following research questions guided the formulation of objectives for the study:
i. What is the impact of Free Trade Areas and Common External Tariffs on the free movement of goods and services within the ECOWAS region?
ii. How has the West African Common Industrial Policy (WACIP) contributed to regional industrial development in the region?
iii. What is the impact of the ECOWAS Regional Agricultural Investment Programme (RAIP) on the level of food security in the region?
iv. How has the implementation of the ECOWAS Programme for Infrastructure Development in Africa (PIDA) contributed to the development of road and railway infrastructures in the region?
v. What measures should be employed by ECOWAS to deliver on its mandate of regional economic integration for member states?
1.5 Significance of the Study
This study will be useful to ECOWAS member states in identifying future options open to them about the benefits that come with the effective implementation of the treaties and policies of the regional body.
The findings of this study will be of immense importance to scholars and graduate students intending to study the role of regional economic integration in multicultural societies such as the ECOWAS sub-region and Africa in general.
The study will form reference material for students of international relations studies and public administrators mainly in areas of regional economic integration. It will also stimulate further studies on regional and economic integration initiatives as exemplified by ECOWAS.
1.6 Scope of the Study
This study is focused on the role of ECOWAS in regional economic integration among member states in the region. Specifically, the researcher narrowed the domain to four as follows: trade, regional industrial development, food security as well as road and railway infrastructures.
1.7 Definition of Key Concepts
Free Trade Areas (FTAs): this can be referred to as a process to reduce or abolish tariff and non-tariff restrictions to trade in goods and services among a group of countries in a given geographical area.
Economic Integration: this is referred to as the commercial policy of discriminatively reducing or eliminating protectionist policies only among participating countries.
Regionalization: this can be defined as the growth of social integration within a region and the often undirected processes of social and economic interaction.
Copyright © 2023 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article.
This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0
If you like this article, see others like it:
- The Doctrine of Separation of Powers and Checks and Balances in the Nigerian Executive-Legislative Relationship
- Complexity of Independent National Electoral Commision’s Operational Space as Challenge to Credible Elections in Nigeria
- The Security Implication of Election Rigging in 3rd World Countries
- Weapons Technology and Internal Security Provisioning in Nigeria
- Change in Political Administration and its Impact on the Economy