THE STUDY OF PROPERTIES OF BRIQUETTE PRODUCED FROM GROUNDNUT SHELL COAL BLEND

THE STUDY OF PROPERTIES OF BRIQUETTE PRODUCED FROM GROUNDNUT SHELL COAL BLEND

CHAPTER ONE

1.0 INTRODUCTION

1.1 Background of the study

Biomass, particularly agricultural residues seem to be one of the most promising energy resources for developing countries (Patomsok, 2008). Rural households and minority of urban dwellers depend solely on fuel woods (charcoal, firewood and sawdust) as their primary sources of energy for the past decades (Onuegbu, 2010). Of all the available energy resources in Nigeria, coal and coal derivatives such as smokeless coal briquettes, bio-coal briquettes, and biomass briquettes have been shown to have the highest potential for use as suitable alternative to coal/ fuel wood in industrial boiler and brick kiln for thermal application and domestic purposes. Global warming has become an international concern. Global warming is caused by greenhouse gasses which carbon dioxide is among the major contributors. It was shown that increased emissions of CO2 have been drastically reduced owing to the fact that the rate of deforestation is higher than the afforestation effort in the country.

The use of fuelwood for cooking has health implications especially on women and children who are disproportionately exposed to the smoke apart from environmental effects. Women in rural areas frequently with young children carried on their back or staying around them, spend one to six hours each day cooking with fuel wood. In some areas, the exposure is even higher especially when the cooking is done in an unventilated place or where fuelwood is used for heating of rooms. Generally, biomass smoke contains a large number of pollutants which at varying concentrations pose substantial risk to human health. Among hundreds of the pollutants and irritants are particulate matters, 1, 2-butadiene and benzene (Schirnding and Bruce, 2002). Studies showed that indoor air pollution levels from combustion of biofuels in Africa are extremely high, and it is often many times above the standard set by US Environmental Protection Agency (US-EPA) for ambient level of these pollutants (USEPA, 1997). Exposure to biomass smoke increases the risk of range of common diseases both in children and in adult. The smoke causes acute lower respiratory infection (ALRI) particularly pneumonia in children (Smith and Samet, 2000; Ezzati and Kammen, 2001).

Agro waste is the most promising energy resource for developing countries like ours. The decreasing availability of fuel woods has necessitated that efforts be made towards efficient utilization of agricultural wastes. These wastes have acquired considerably importance as fuels for many purposes, for instance, domestic cooking and industrial heating. Some of these agricultural wastes for example, coconut shell, wood pulp and wood waste can be utilized directly as fuels.

Fortunately, researches have shown that a cleaner, affordable fuel source which is a substitute to fuel wood can be produced by blending biomass (agricultural residues and wastes) with coal. Nigeria has large coal deposit which has remained untapped since 1950’s, following the discovery of petroleum in the country. Also, millions of tons of agricultural wastes are generated in Nigeria annually. But it is unfortunate that farmers still practice “slash-and-burn” agriculture.

These agricultural wastes they encounter during clearing of land for farming or during processing of agricultural produce are usually burnt off. By this practice, not only that the useful raw materials are wasted, it further pollutes the environment and reduces soil fertility.

On the other hand, the majority of the huge materials are not suitable to be used directly as fuel without undergoing some processes. This is probably as a result of inappropriate density and high moisture contents and these factors may cause problems in transportation, handling and storage. Most of these wastes are left to decompose or when they are burnt, there would be environmental pollution and degradation (Jekayinfa, and Omisakin, 2005). Researchers have shown that lots of potential energies are abounding in these residues (Fapetu, 2000). Hence, there is a need to convert these wastes into forms that can alleviate the problems they pose when use directly. An assessment of the potential availability of selected residues from maize, cassava, millet, plantain, groundnuts, sorghum, oil palm, palm kernel, and cowpeas for possible conversion to renewable energy in Nigeria has been made (Jekayinfa and Scholz, 2009).

However, these health hazard faced by people from the use of fuel wood, along with the agricultural wastes management and reduction of pressure mounted on the forest can be mitigated if Nigeria will switch over to production and utilization of bio-coal briquette; a cleaner, and environmental friendly fuel wood substitute made from agricultural wastes and coal. Moreover, this will offer a good potential for utilization of a large coal reserve in Nigeria for economic diversification and employment generation through bio-coal briquette.

In countries like Japan, China and India, it was observed that agricultural waste (agro residues) can also be briquetted and used as substitute for wood fuel. Every year, millions of tonnes of agricultural waste are generated. These are either not used or burnt inefficiently in their loose form causing air pollution to the environment. The major residues are rice husk, corn cob, coconut shell, jute stick, groundnut shell, cotton stalk, etc. These wastes provide energy by converting into high-density fuel briquettes. These briquettes are very cheap, even cheaper than coal briquettes. Adoption of briquette technology will not only create a safe and hygienic way of disposing the waste, but turn into a cash rich venture by converting waste into energy and also contributing towards a better environment.

Coal can be blended with a small quantity of these agricultural waste (agro residues) to produce briquettes (bio-coal briquettes) which ignites fast, burn efficiently, producing little or no smoke and are cheaper than coal briquettes.

REFERENCES

Akinyosoye, J. (1993). Tropical Agriculture for Senior Secondary Schools. London: Macmillan Publishers Ltd.

Bhattacharya, C. (1985).Dandified Biomass in Thailand: Potential Status and Problems.Elsevier Applied Science, Vol. 34 (23).Pp. 255-259.

Fapetu, O.P. (2000). Management of Energy from Biomass.Nigeria Journal of Engineering Management, Vol. 7 (17) Pp. 789-793.

Ezzati, M., & D.Kammen, M. (2001).An Exposure-Response Relationship for Acute Respiratory Infection as a Result of Exposure to Indoor Air Pollution from Biomass Combustion in Kenya.Kenya: Maxwell Printing Press.

Hayami, H. Y., Kojima T., & K. Yoshioka, K. (2001). Bio-coal briquettes and Planting trees as an experimental CDM. China: Kong Yong Publications.

Jekayinfa, S. O.,& Omisakin, O. (2005). The energy potentials of some Agricultural wastes as local Fuel materials in Nigeria.Agricultural Engineering International(CIGR). Journal of Scientific Research and Development,Vol. 9. (14). p.10.

Jekayinfa, S. O.,& Scholz, V. (2009). Potential Availability of Energetically Usable Crop Residues in Nigeria.Lagos: Ola and Sons Ltd.

Joe O. C. (2007). Kingsford Charcoal Ingredient; CaliforniaBarbecus Association website of all about charcoal. California: Middle Press Intl.

Maciejewska, A., Veringa, H., Sanders, J., & S.Peteve, D. (2006). Co-firing of Biomass With Coal Constraints and Role of Biomass. International Journal of Biomass and Constraint, Vol. 79. (34). Pp. 786-789.

Mangena, S. J. & Cann, V. (2007). Binderless Briquetting of Some Selected South African Prime Cooking. International Journal of Health Maintenance, Vol. 71. (45). Pp. 300-312.

Mohammad, S. B. (2005). Bio-coal Briquette Cleaner, Affordable and Sustainable Fuel to Indonesia.Indonesia: Hulk-up Press.

Moore, W., & Johnson, D. (1999). Procedures for the Chemical Analysis of Wood and Wood Products. Madison, U.S. Forest Products Laboratory. U.S.A: Department of Press.

Onuegbu, T. U. (2010). Improving Fuel Wood Efficiency in Rural Nigeria: (A Case of Briquette Technology).International Journal of Chemistry in Nigeria. Vol. 3 (4) Pp. 35-39.

Onuegbu, T.,Uzoma, F., & Ikechukwu, M. K. (2010). Enhancing the properties of coal Briquette using spear grass.Leonardo Journal of Sciences, Vol. 9. (17). Pp. 47-58.

Onuegbu, T.U.,Ogbu, I.M., Ilochi, N.O., Okafor,I.,Obumselu, O. F., & Ekpunobi, U.E. (2010b). Enhancing the Efficiency of Coal Briquette in Rural Nigeria using Pennisetum Purpurem. Vol. 4. (3) Pp. 299-304.

Onuegbu, T. U., Ilochi, N. O., & Okafor I. (2006). Preparation ofEnvironmentally Friendly Bio Coal Briquette from Ground nut Shell and maize cob biomass waste. Comparative Effect of Ignition time and water boiling Studies, Vol. 4. (4) Pp. 110-118.

Patomsok, W. (2008).Density Equation of Bio-coal Briquette and Quantity of Maize Cob. Thailand: Sample Express Inc.

Schirnding Y. Von., & Bruce, N. (2002).Addressing the Impact of Household Energy and Indoor Air Pollution on the Health of the Poor: Implication for Policy Action and Intervention Measures.Washington D C: Multi-In Press.

SmithK, T. F., & Samet, U. (2000): Indoor Air Pollution in Developing Countries and Acute Respiratory Infection in Children. Thorax: London Express Inc.

Somchai, O. B.,Kunchana, O., & Duangporn, T. (1988). Desulfurization of Coal Briquettes by Lime Department of Chemical Technology.Thailand: Chulalongkorn University Press.

Wilfred, F., & C. Martin, P. (1980). Fuels and Fuel Technology.New York: Pera-Gamon Publishing Company.